Merger Design Team Meeting - October 4
| What |
|
|---|---|
| When |
Oct 04, 2010 from time_format to time_format |
| Where | Metropolitan Library System and pre-arranged videoconference sites |
| Add event to calendar |
|
Meeting of the Merger Design Team
October 4, 2010, 7 p.m. – MLS/Burr Ridge & Prearranged Videoconference Sites[1]
AGENDA – FINAL DRAFT
1. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER – Su Erickson, Team Chair
2. ROLL CALL OF THE MEMBERS OF THE MERGER DESIGN TEAM – Jane Plass, Team Secretary
3. REQUEST BY TEAM MEMBERS TO ATTEND BY MEANS OTHER THAN PHYSICAL PRESENCE – Action Item
(5 ILCS 120/7) Sec. 7. Attendance by a means other than physical presence.
(a) If a quorum of the members of the public body is physically present as required by Section 2.01, a majority of the public body may allow a member of that body to attend the meeting by other means if the member is prevented from physically attending because of: (i) personal illness or disability; (ii) employment purposes or the business of the public body; or (iii) a family or other emergency. "Other means" is by video or audio conference.
3.1. Charlet Key, PALS (PALS Coal Valley Service Center)
3.2. Sue Herring, Kitty Pope, John Richmond, and Web Turner, ALS (ALS East Peoria Office)
4. REPORT ON THE OPEN MEETINGS ACT – Kathy Caudill, Merger Design Team Open Meetings Act Designee
4.1. Letter to the Illinois State Library in Response of OMA Concerns – Document 4.1
4.2. Clarification on the Use of Web Conferencing by the Merger Design Team
5. RECOGNITION OF GUESTS & ANNOUNCEMENTS – Su Erickson
6. PUBLIC COMMENT – Su Erickson
6.1. Request for comments from persons at MLS/Burr Ridge
6.2. Request for comments from each prearranged videoconference site
7. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA – Su Erickson - Action Item
8. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES- Action Item
8.1. September 14, 2010 Meeting Minutes – Document 8
9. UPDATES FROM SYSTEMS – System Representatives - Discussion
9.1. Fiscal Year 2011 Status of Services, Budgets, and Properties
9.1.1. ALS, DLS, MLS, NSLS, PALS
10. MERGER CONSULTANT – Su Erickson - Action Item
10.1. Request for Proposal (RFP) for Merger Consultant – Document 10.1
10.2. Discussion on Responses to the Request for Proposal (RFP) for Merger Consultant
10.3. Recommendation for Hiring a Consultant
10.4. Motion to Hire Consultant
11. TEAM SUBCOMMITTEES – Su Erickson - Action Item
11.1. Decisions of the Merger Design Team on September 14, 2010 – Document 11.1
11.2. Report from Systems on Appointments by Team Delegations to Subcommittees
11.2.1. ALS, DLS, MLS, NSLS, PALS
11.3. Charges to Subcommittees
11.3.1. Recommendation of System Executive Staff – Document 11.3.1
11.3.2. Approval of Subcommittee Charges by Merger Design Team
11.4. Appointment of Subcommittee Chairs
11.4.1. Nominations – Document 11.4.1
11.4.2. Statements by Candidates
11.4.3. Selection of Subcommittee Chairs by Merger Design Team
12. MERGER PROPOSAL – Su Erickson - Discussion
12.1. Application to the State Librarian together with a plan for the creation of the new system. Such
application shall contain:
o Complete list of all liabilities of the library system.
o Complete list of all assets of the library system including detailed equipment descriptions.
o Proposals for distribution of assets/liabilities. The sale of any equipment or real property requires the prior approval of the State Librarian.[2] Every effort shall be made to offer equipment items for the continuance of system services by the successor system or systems or to member libraries.
o A plan for the orderly transition of system services.
12.2. Report from the Illinois State Library (ISL) regarding application details
13. INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS – Su Erickson - Discussion
13.1. Discussion with the Illinois State Library (ISL) regarding ISL recommendation for intergovernmental agreements
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Illinois Library System Presidents
FROM: Anne Craig, Director
Illinois State Library
DATE: July 19, 2010
SUBJECT: Responses to Questions Received About Restructuring Library Systems
Intergovernmental Agreements
Further, it is our recommendation that, once formal merger processes are undertaken, each of you seek intergovernmental agreements between library system entities that specify all roles and expectations during the merger and transitional period. At the point the new library system organization(s) is formed and approved by the Secretary of State/Illinois State Library, these intergovernmental agreements would expire and all functions would be governed by the new entity.
14. MEETING SCHEDULE – Su Erickson - Discussion
14.1. Dates for future meetings coordinated with and by merger consultant
14.2. What format(s) for future meetings works best for Team members? (e.g., weeknights, weekends)
14.3. Location Issues
14.3.1. Desire to meet around the region
14.3.2. A quorum must be present in person at the primary meeting location
14.3.3. Is it correct that DLS, MLS, and NSLS Team members (12 of 20 members) are not permitted to attend the meeting by other means since DLS, MLS, and NSLS are under 4,500 square miles?
15. NEXT MEETING AGENDA ITEMS – Su Erickson - Discussion
15.1. Reports from the consultant
15.1.1. Development and implementation of a merger design plan including a Merger Design Team meeting schedule, key decisions points, and timeline
15.1.2. Design and implementation of a communications plan for the merger process
15.1.3. Development of shared vision, mission, and values for the merged system
15.1.4. Design of a governance structure, including bylaws and name of the merged system
15.2. Other items…
16. EVALUATION OF MEETING REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS ACT – Kathy Caudill - Discussion
17. PUBLIC COMMENT – Su Erickson - Discussion
17.1. Request for comments from persons at MLS/Burr Ridge
17.2. Request for comments from each prearranged videoconference site
18. ADJOURN – Su Erickson - Action Item
[1] Merger Design Team members should confer with the executive director of their system to plan and implement videoconference services.
[2] 10.1 (c) – Clarify language that allows system boards to sell items (valued below $250, for example). Does each and every sale of system property, whatever the value of the property being sold, require ISL approval prior to the sale?

